Activities - 修订历史

MrMrRPG在2018年10月18日 (四) 05:44

2018-10-18T05:44:30Z

MrMrRPG在2018年10月18日 (四) 05:43

2018-10-18T05:43:29Z

显示差异

MrMrRPG在2018年10月17日 (三) 05:17

2018-10-17T05:17:49Z

←上一修订		在2018年10月17日 (三) 05:17所做的修订版本
第18行：		第18行：
	"Abstract"		"Abstract"

-	With both liberal social values emerging into a society that still upholds traditional Chinese values, sex education (SE) is being increasingly difficult to be discussed in Hong Kong (HK). Since minimal resources has been provided for instructors to educate their students on SE, alternative methods of educating SE has to be derived urgently before sexually related health risks such as sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies continue to grow. One of these alternative methods is through the process of gamification (Kapp, 2012), which had been yielding more positive results than traditional classroom settings (Arnab et. al., 2013; Bull et. al., 2012: Frost et. al., 2012). “Rescue Mission” (RM) is gamified platform catered towards HK secondary school students to foster their learning experience of SE. While rescuing a virtual dying patient, players of RM would also learn and engage in the discussion of SE supported with gamified elements. After playing with RM, users are expected to be informed about and be more aware of the attitudes towards SE.	+	With both liberal social values emerging into a society that still upholds traditional Chinese values, sex education (SE) is being increasingly difficult to be discussed in Hong Kong (HK). Since minimal resources has been provided for instructors to educate their students on SE, alternative methods of educating SE has to be derived urgently before sexually related health risks such as sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies continue to grow. One of these alternative methods is through the process of gamification (Kapp, 2012), which had been yielding more positive results than traditional classroom settings (Arnab et. al., 2013; Bull et. al., 2012: Frost et. al., 2012). “Rescue Mission” (RM) is gamified platform catered towards HK secondary school students to foster their learning experience of SE. While rescuing a virtual dying patient, players of RM would also learn and engage in the discussion of SE supported with gamified elements. After playing with RM, users are expected to be informed about and be more aware of the attitudes towards SE. A prototype of RM was launched in 2017 and 100 HK secondary school students had tested its effects. Although only a pilot study, all participants had scored at least 80% from the readings they had read, suggesting its effectiveness to HK secondary school students.

	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students		Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students
第40行：		第40行：

	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.		RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.
		+
		+	Rescue Mission prototype and effects
		+	A prototype of RM was launched in 2017 to test its effects. The population were one hundred (100) HK local secondary school students. All the participants had an assigned alias and password to login, but may write their own alias on the leaderboard for anonymity. The participants may login and use RM whenever they wish. The participants of the prototype has demonstrated an effect of RM, as all participants had scored more than an average of 80% on the questions as of 16th October 2018. Although this is only a pilot study, the result is certainly welcoming to the use of gamification of SE in HK secondary school students. Further studies will be done to examine the effectiveness of RM in a not too distant future.
		+

	"References'		"References'
第59行：		第63行：
	Klein, J. H. (1985). The Abstraction of Reality for Games and Simulations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(8), 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1985.124		Klein, J. H. (1985). The Abstraction of Reality for Games and Simulations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(8), 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1985.124
	Lepper, M. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction.		Lepper, M. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction.
-	Li, X., & Chu, S. K. W. (2018). Using design-based research methodology to develop a pedagogy for teaching and learning of Chinese writing with wiki among Chinese upper primary school students. ELSEVIER, 126, 359–375.
	Malone, T., & Lepper, M. (1988). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, III, 229–253.		Malone, T., & Lepper, M. (1988). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, III, 229–253.
	Mellanby, A. R., Phelps, F. A., Crichton, N. J., & Tripp, J. H. (1995). School sex education: an experimental programme with educational and medical benefit. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 311(7002), 414–417.		Mellanby, A. R., Phelps, F. A., Crichton, N. J., & Tripp, J. H. (1995). School sex education: an experimental programme with educational and medical benefit. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 311(7002), 414–417.

MrMrRPG在2018年10月16日 (二) 20:10

2018-10-16T20:10:26Z

←上一修订		在2018年10月16日 (二) 20:10所做的修订版本
第7行：		第7行：

	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students		Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students
		+
	Joshua Ng, Xuanxi Li, Wendy Wu, Samuel Chu		Joshua Ng, Xuanxi Li, Wendy Wu, Samuel Chu
		+
	University of Hong Kong		University of Hong Kong
		+
	East China Normal University		East China Normal University
		+
	University of California, Irvine		University of California, Irvine

MrMrRPG在2018年10月16日 (二) 20:09

2018-10-16T20:09:59Z

←上一修订		在2018年10月16日 (二) 20:09所做的修订版本
第6行：		第6行：
	ngyf@uci.edu		ngyf@uci.edu

		+	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students
		+	Joshua Ng, Xuanxi Li, Wendy Wu, Samuel Chu
		+	University of Hong Kong
		+	East China Normal University
		+	University of California, Irvine
		+
		+	"Abstract"
		+
		+	With both liberal social values emerging into a society that still upholds traditional Chinese values, sex education (SE) is being increasingly difficult to be discussed in Hong Kong (HK). Since minimal resources has been provided for instructors to educate their students on SE, alternative methods of educating SE has to be derived urgently before sexually related health risks such as sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies continue to grow. One of these alternative methods is through the process of gamification (Kapp, 2012), which had been yielding more positive results than traditional classroom settings (Arnab et. al., 2013; Bull et. al., 2012: Frost et. al., 2012). “Rescue Mission” (RM) is gamified platform catered towards HK secondary school students to foster their learning experience of SE. While rescuing a virtual dying patient, players of RM would also learn and engage in the discussion of SE supported with gamified elements. After playing with RM, users are expected to be informed about and be more aware of the attitudes towards SE.

	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students		Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students

-	~~Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited~~ to ~~sex~~ and ~~relationships. One~~ of ~~the effect~~ of ~~this phenomenon~~ is ~~the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents~~ (~~Family Planning Association of Hong Kong~~, 2012). ~~Unfortunately the increase~~ of ~~underage sex has also increased the numbers~~ of ~~several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents~~. ~~Two of these health issues~~ are ~~the spread of sexually transmitted infections~~ (~~STI~~) and ~~unplanned pregnancy~~ (~~Tsang~~, ~~2014~~). ~~To prevent~~ the ~~health risks~~ of ~~unsafe sexual activities~~, ~~adolescents should be properly informed about sexuality education~~ (SE).	+	Current literature suggests alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”. Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).

-	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had ~~received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective ''(please state some facts to support this)'' on~~ the ~~SE topics being taught~~ in ~~the~~ classroom (~~Curriculum Development Council~~, ~~1998~~). ~~With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective~~ within the ~~classrooms of HK~~. ~~But to further complicate this issue~~, ~~traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related~~ to ~~SE being discussed~~ in and ~~outside of classrooms~~ (~~Chang~~, ~~1991~~, ~~Okasaki~~, ~~2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere~~, ~~HK adolescents had minimal~~, ~~if at all~~, exposure to the holistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012~~; Tsang, 2014~~). ~~With the current SE atmosphere in HK,~~ an effective ~~method~~ to ~~educate~~ HK ~~students in SE and~~ to ~~have them engage in~~ a ~~healthy~~ discussion ~~is imminent and urgent~~.	+	Previous research had demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.

	"Gamification: An alternative method"		"Gamification: An alternative method"
第22行：		第31行：
	"Rescue Mission and its Game Elements"		"Rescue Mission and its Game Elements"

-	The e-learning platform ~~"Rescue Mission"~~ (RM) was developed with funding from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.	+	The e-learning platform “Rescue Mission” (RM) was developed with funding from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process. RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to correctly answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.
-	RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE ~~correctly~~. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 50% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to compare their scores to other players.	+
		+	There are several design details that RM take advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the sub-texts would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.
		+
		+	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.

-	There are several design details that RM takes advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the hints would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.	+	"References'
-	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or too low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.	+

		+	Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., … de Freitas, S. (2013). The Development Approach of a Pedagogically-driven Serious Game to Support Relationship and Sex Education (RSE) within a Classroom Setting. Computers & Education, 69, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.013
		+	Ausubel, D. P., & Youssef, M. (1965). The Effect of Spaced Repetition on Meaningful Retention. The Journal of General Psychology, 73(1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1965.9711263
		+	Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1971). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Corperation, 1.
		+	Bull, S. S., Levine, D. K., Black, S. R., Schmiege, S. J., & Santelli, J. (2012). Social Media–Delivered Sexual Health Intervention: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(5), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.022
		+	Chang, J. (1977). The Tao of Love and Sex: The Ancient Chinese Way to Ecstasy. Wildwood House.
		+	Chu, S. (2017). Rescue Mission. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from https://smartchoicesv2.proj.hkedcity.net/rm/
		+	Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.
		+	Crawford, C. (2003). Chris Crawford on game design. Indianapolis, IN.
		+	Curriculum Development Council. (1998). Syllabuses for secondary school: Science (Secondary 1-3). Curriculum Development Council, Hong Kong Education Bureau Printing Department. Retrieved from https://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/science/is/sci_syllabus_S1to3_e.pdf
		+	Family Planning Association of Hong Kong. (2017, June 12). Report on Youth Sexuality Study 2016 - The Family Planning Association of Hong Kong. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://www.famplan.org.hk/en/media-centre/press-releases/detail/fpahk-report-on-youth-sexuality-study
		+	Frost, J. J., Lindberg, L. D., & Finer, L. B. (2012). Young Adults’ Contraceptive Knowledge, Norms and Attitudes: Associations with Risk Of Unintended Pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1363/4410712
		+	Juul, J. (2009). Fear of failing? The many meanings of difficulty in video games, 237–252.
		+	Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
		+	Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
		+	Klein, J. H. (1985). The Abstraction of Reality for Games and Simulations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(8), 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1985.124
		+	Lepper, M. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction.
		+	Li, X., & Chu, S. K. W. (2018). Using design-based research methodology to develop a pedagogy for teaching and learning of Chinese writing with wiki among Chinese upper primary school students. ELSEVIER, 126, 359–375.
		+	Malone, T., & Lepper, M. (1988). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, III, 229–253.
		+	Mellanby, A. R., Phelps, F. A., Crichton, N. J., & Tripp, J. H. (1995). School sex education: an experimental programme with educational and medical benefit. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 311(7002), 414–417.
		+	Okazaki, S. (2002). Influences of Culture on Asian Americans’ Sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 34–41.
		+	Red Ribbon Centre. (2014). Fact sheet on Survey of Life Skills-based Education on HIV/AIDS at Junior Level of Secondary Schools in Hong Kong. Red Ribbon Centre, Department of Health, Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://www.rrc.gov.hk/res/lsbe_02.pdf
		+	Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
		+	Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundementals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
		+	Schell, J. (2015). The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition. CRC Press.
		+	Tsang, E. (2014, August 26). Number of new HIV cases in Hong Kong set to reach record high. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1580798/new-hiv-cases-set-reach-record-high-hong-kong-fourth-year-row
		+	Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

	Li, Xuanxi		Li, Xuanxi

Wendy在2018年10月16日 (二) 08:23

2018-10-16T08:23:07Z

Wendy在2018年10月16日 (二) 08:11

2018-10-16T08:11:43Z

←上一修订		在2018年10月16日 (二) 08:11所做的修订版本
第22行：		第22行：
	"Rescue Mission and its Game Elements"		"Rescue Mission and its Game Elements"

-	~~In collaboration~~ with the Hong Kong Jockey Club~~, Dr. S. Chu from Hong Kong University has launched a website called “Rescue Mission” (RM) in 2016 aiming~~ to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.	+	The e-learning platform "Rescue Mission" (RM) was developed with funding from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.
	RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE correctly. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.		RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE correctly. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.

第37行：		第37行：


-	Wendy	+	Wu,Wendy
-		+	The University of Hong Kong
		+	wendywu@hku.hk

	Chu, S. K.W.		Chu, S. K.W.
-	University of Hong Kong	+	The University of Hong Kong
	samchu@hku.hk		samchu@hku.hk

Wendy在2018年10月16日 (二) 06:06

2018-10-16T06:06:02Z

←上一修订		在2018年10月16日 (二) 06:06所做的修订版本
第11行：		第11行：
	Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sex education (SE).		Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sex education (SE).

-	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective on the SE topics being taught in the classroom (Curriculum Development Council, 1998). With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective within the classrooms of HK. But to further complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if at all, exposure to the wholistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.	+	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective ''(please state some facts to support this)'' on the SE topics being taught in the classroom (Curriculum Development Council, 1998). With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective within the classrooms of HK. But to further complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if at all, exposure to the wholistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.

	"Gamification: An alternative method"		"Gamification: An alternative method"

MrMrRPG在2018年10月9日 (二) 17:07

2018-10-09T17:07:02Z

MrMrRPG在2018年10月9日 (二) 17:06

2018-10-09T17:06:04Z

←上一修订		在2018年10月9日 (二) 17:06所做的修订版本
第5行：		第5行：
	University of California, Irvine		University of California, Irvine
	ngyf@uci.edu		ngyf@uci.edu
		+
		+
		+	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students
		+	Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sex education (SE).
		+	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective on the SE topics being taught in the classroom (Curriculum Development Council, 1998). With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective within the classrooms of HK. But to further complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if at all, exposure to the wholistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.
		+
		+	"Gamification: An alternative method"
		+	Previous literature had suggested alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”.
		+	Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).
		+	Previous research had demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.
		+	Rescue Mission and its Game Elements
		+	In collaboration with the Hong Kong Jockey Club, Dr. S. Chu from Hong Kong University has launched a website called “Rescue Mission” (RM) in 2016 aiming to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.
		+	RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE correctly. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.
		+	There are several design details that RM takes advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the sub-texts would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.
		+	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.

←上一修订		在2018年10月18日 (四) 05:44所做的修订版本
第17行：		第17行：


-	�
	Abstract		Abstract
-	With both liberal social values emerging into a society that still upholds traditional Chinese values, sex education (SE) is being increasingly difficult to be discussed in Hong Kong (HK). Since minimal resources has been provided for instructors to educate their students on SE, alternative methods of educating SE has to be derived urgently before sexually related health risks such as sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies continue to grow. One of these alternative methods is through the process of gamification (Kapp, 2012), which had been yielding more positive results than traditional classroom settings (Arnab et. al., 2013; Bull et. al., 2012: Frost et. al., 2012). “Rescue Mission” (RM) is gamified platform catered towards HK secondary school students to foster their learning experience of SE. While rescuing a virtual dying patient, players of RM would also learn and engage in the discussion of SE supported with gamified elements. After playing with RM, users are expected to be informed about and be more aware of the attitudes towards SE. A prototype of RM was launched in 2017 and 100 HK secondary school students had tested its effects. Although only a pilot study, all participants had a mean score of 85.98 (SD = 4.12) from the readings they had read, suggesting its effectiveness to HK secondary school students.�	+
		+
		+	With both liberal social values emerging into a society that still upholds traditional Chinese values, sex education (SE) is being increasingly difficult to be discussed in Hong Kong (HK). Since minimal resources has been provided for instructors to educate their students on SE, alternative methods of educating SE has to be derived urgently before sexually related health risks such as sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies continue to grow. One of these alternative methods is through the process of gamification (Kapp, 2012), which had been yielding more positive results than traditional classroom settings (Arnab et. al., 2013; Bull et. al., 2012: Frost et. al., 2012). “Rescue Mission” (RM) is gamified platform catered towards HK secondary school students to foster their learning experience of SE. While rescuing a virtual dying patient, players of RM would also learn and engage in the discussion of SE supported with gamified elements. After playing with RM, users are expected to be informed about and be more aware of the attitudes towards SE. A prototype of RM was launched in 2017 and 100 HK secondary school students had tested its effects. Although only a pilot study, all participants had a mean score of 85.98 (SD = 4.12) from the readings they had read, suggesting its effectiveness to HK secondary school students.
		+

	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students		Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students
		+

	Hong Kong (HK) societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sex education (SE).		Hong Kong (HK) societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sex education (SE).

-	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. But to complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if any, exposure to the wholistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancies (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.�	+	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. But to complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if any, exposure to the wholistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancies (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.
		+
		+
	Gamification: An alternative method		Gamification: An alternative method
		+

	Current literature suggests alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”. Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).		Current literature suggests alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”. Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).
	Previous research had demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.		Previous research had demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.
		+

	Rescue Mission and its game elements		Rescue Mission and its game elements
		+

	The e-learning platform “Rescue Mission” (RM) was developed with funding from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process. RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to correctly answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.		The e-learning platform “Rescue Mission” (RM) was developed with funding from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process. RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to correctly answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.
		+

	There are several design details that RM take advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the sub-texts would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.		There are several design details that RM take advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the sub-texts would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.
		+

	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names which may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet and a registered account.		RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names which may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet and a registered account.
		+

	A prototype of RM was launched in 2017 to test its effects. The population were one hundred (100) HK local secondary school students. All the participants had an assigned alias and password to login, but may write their own alias on the leaderboard for anonymity. The participants may login and use RM whenever they wish. The mean score was 85.98 out of 100 (SD = 4.12) on the questions as of 16th October 2018. Although this is only a pilot study, the result is certainly welcoming to the use of gamification of SE in HK secondary school students. Further studies will be done to examine the effectiveness of RM in a not too distant future.		A prototype of RM was launched in 2017 to test its effects. The population were one hundred (100) HK local secondary school students. All the participants had an assigned alias and password to login, but may write their own alias on the leaderboard for anonymity. The participants may login and use RM whenever they wish. The mean score was 85.98 out of 100 (SD = 4.12) on the questions as of 16th October 2018. Although this is only a pilot study, the result is certainly welcoming to the use of gamification of SE in HK secondary school students. Further studies will be done to examine the effectiveness of RM in a not too distant future.
-	�	+
		+
		+
	References		References
		+
		+

	Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., … de Freitas, S. (2013). The Development Approach of a Pedagogically-driven Serious Game to Support Relationship and Sex Education (RSE) within a Classroom Setting. Computers & Education, 69, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.013		Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., … de Freitas, S. (2013). The Development Approach of a Pedagogically-driven Serious Game to Support Relationship and Sex Education (RSE) within a Classroom Setting. Computers & Education, 69, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.013

←上一修订		在2018年10月16日 (二) 08:23所做的修订版本
第9行：		第9行：
	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students		Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students

-	Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about ~~sex~~ education (SE).	+	Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sexuality education (SE).

-	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective ''(please state some facts to support this)'' on the SE topics being taught in the classroom (Curriculum Development Council, 1998). With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective within the classrooms of HK. But to further complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if at all, exposure to the ~~wholistic~~ discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.	+	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective ''(please state some facts to support this)'' on the SE topics being taught in the classroom (Curriculum Development Council, 1998). With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective within the classrooms of HK. But to further complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if at all, exposure to the holistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.

	"Gamification: An alternative method"		"Gamification: An alternative method"

-	~~Previous~~ literature ~~had suggested~~ alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”.	+	Current literature suggests alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”.
	Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).		Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).

-	Previous research ~~had~~ demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.	+	Previous research has demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.

	"Rescue Mission and its Game Elements"		"Rescue Mission and its Game Elements"

	The e-learning platform "Rescue Mission" (RM) was developed with funding from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.		The e-learning platform "Rescue Mission" (RM) was developed with funding from the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.
-	RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE correctly. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player ~~to input an alias~~ to compare their scores to other players.	+	RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE correctly. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 50% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to compare their scores to other players.

-	There are several design details that RM takes advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the ~~sub-texts~~ would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.	+	There are several design details that RM takes advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the hints would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.
-	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.	+	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or too low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.


第48行：		第48行：
	'''Abstract'''		'''Abstract'''

-	This study aims to design and develop a game-based learning environment to help students learn Sex Education (SE) knowledge. A game-based platform named "Rescue Mission" (https://smartchoicesv2.proj.hkedcity.net/rm/)has been developed based on ~~(please find the~~ theory - ~~what what~~ theory). This study described the design of this platform. Besides, a pilot study has been done to investigate the Effectiveness of online story-based Gamification Platform. Participants are (how many) Hong Kong secondary school students. Results found that students have high engagement, % students have a score higher than 80. This study may shed ~~some lights~~ on how information technology used to foster ~~Sex Education~~ (SE) among secondary school students.	+	This study aims to design and develop a game-based learning environment to help students learn Sex Education (SE) knowledge. A game-based platform named "Rescue Mission" (https://smartchoicesv2.proj.hkedcity.net/rm/)has been developed based on social learning theory, self-determination theory, flow theory, and motivation theory. This study described the design of this platform. This study may shed light on how information technology used to foster sexuality education (SE) among secondary school students.

←上一修订		在2018年10月9日 (二) 17:07所做的修订版本
第8行：		第8行：

	Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students		Rescue Mission: Gamification of Sex Education for Hong Kong Students
		+
	Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sex education (SE).		Hong Kong societic values has been increasingly liberal; those values are not limited to sex and relationships. One of the effect of this phenomenon is the increasing numbers of underage sexual intercourse among HK adolescents (Family Planning Association of Hong Kong, 2012). Unfortunately the increase of underage sex has also increased the numbers of several health issues especially amongst HK adolescents. Two of these health issues are the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) and unplanned pregnancy (Tsang, 2014). To prevent the health risks of unsafe sexual activities, adolescents should be properly informed about sex education (SE).
		+
	Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective on the SE topics being taught in the classroom (Curriculum Development Council, 1998). With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective within the classrooms of HK. But to further complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if at all, exposure to the wholistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.		Regrettably current SE atmosphere in HK is far from adequate. According to Red Ribbon Centre (2014), HK secondary school instructors only spend on average three hours per academic year teaching topics related to SE and had received minimal training and resources to educate students on SE. The HK secondary school curriculum is also highly selective on the SE topics being taught in the classroom (Curriculum Development Council, 1998). With these issues in mind, SE has largely been ineffective within the classrooms of HK. But to further complicate this issue, traditional Chinese values further obstruct topics related to SE being discussed in and outside of classrooms (Chang, 1991, Okasaki, 2002). With the above factors affecting the overall SE atmosphere, HK adolescents had minimal, if at all, exposure to the wholistic discussion of SE. This phenomenon also arguably restricted awareness of safe sex among HK adolescents which could further intensify the already increasing numbers of STI and unplanned pregnancy (FPAHK, 2012; Tsang, 2014). With the current SE atmosphere in HK, an effective method to educate HK students in SE and to have them engage in a healthy discussion is imminent and urgent.

	"Gamification: An alternative method"		"Gamification: An alternative method"
		+
	Previous literature had suggested alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”.		Previous literature had suggested alternative methods to foster SE and discussion within and outside of classrooms; one of which is through gamification (Kapp, 2012). Some scholars had defined game as “systematic” abstracts which allows its participant(s) to engage in a fictional “conflict” (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). Gamification is to use elements of games to foster “learning and engagement” of a certain subject or idea (Kapp, 2012). Even though there were no standardized measures, Kapp (2012) suggested twelve elements present in games. The elements are (1) “Abstractions of concepts and reality”; (2) “Goals”; (3) “Rules” (Keller, 1987), (4) “Conflict, competition, or cooperation” (Malone & Lepper, 1988); (5) “Time”; (6) “Reward structures”; (7) “Feedback” (Hunicke, 2009); (8) “Levels”; (9) “Storytelling”; (10) “Curve of interest”; (11) “Aesthetics”; (12) “Replay or do over”.
	Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).		Several theories from previous literature supports gamification in education. One of which is motivation theory, especially in the taxonomy of intrinsic motivation (Lepper, 1988; Malone, 1988). Other theories are self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci, 2000), social learning theory (Bandura & Walters, 1971), and flow theory (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).
		+
	Previous research had demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.		Previous research had demonstrated the efficiency of using games in education compared to dictated classroom approaches (Arnab et. al., 2013). One of the conclusions was gamification creates effective interventions which stimulated peer involvement within the discussed topic. The interactive process of gamification is not only engaging but also pedagogically sound, which are vital to effective learning (Arnab et. al. 2013). Other prior researches had applied gamification in sex education in their respective cultural contexts and achieved positive results (Bull, Levine, Black, Schmiege, & Santelli, 2012; Frost, Lindberg, & Finer, 2012). Therefore gamification could be an effective alternative to the current model of HK secondary schools to foster a more engaging discussion of SE.
-	Rescue Mission and its Game Elements	+
-	In collaboration with the Hong Kong Jockey Club, Dr. S. Chu from Hong Kong University has launched a website called “Rescue Mission” (RM) in 2016 aiming to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.	+	"Rescue Mission and its Game Elements"
		+
		+	In collaboration with the Hong Kong Jockey Club, Dr. S. Chu from Hong Kong University has launched a website called “Rescue Mission” (RM) in 2016 aiming to educate HK secondary school students on the proper information and attitudes of SE by gamifying the learning process.
	RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE correctly. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.		RM only has one goal to its players: To rescue a dying patient. But to rescue the patient the player has to answer multiple-choice questions from different modules about SE correctly. These questions were derived from readings from institutions that had been contributing to developing SE, such as FPAHK. Answering the questions correctly would improve the patient’s health, even becoming a superhuman. Failing to answer the questions correctly would deteriorate the patient’s health, even to his death. Fortunately, the patient could be resurrected by correctly answering more questions. The player would receive a second chance if they answer a question incorrectly at first, but they would only receive 80% of the score as a slight penalty for a correct second try. There is also an online leaderboard for the player to input an alias to compare their scores to other players.
		+
	There are several design details that RM takes advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the sub-texts would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.		There are several design details that RM takes advantage of the game elements suggested by Kapp (2012). With “Abstractions of concepts and reality”, the patient can be resurrected and to have super powers, which are both fantastical elements but they motivate the player to learn more about. The player also fulfills the goals of rescuing the patients and potentially to compete with other players, while indirectly fulfilling the goal of the designer - to learn about SE. The rules of the game is clearly defined; wrong answers would have negative reinforcements while right answers would have positive reinforcements. There are less conflicts and cooperation being exhibited as RM is a single-player game, but competition is clearly demonstrated with the leaderboard system. Time is not a resource in-game, but is one within competition between players as most players are trying to get the highest scores in the least amount of time. RM also exhibits reward structures as the in-game reward is the patient’s health while social reward in the leaderboard. Feedbacks are also available in-game as there would be sub-texts informing the player in both failed and successful attempts; moreover, both the sub-texts would guide the player to think in a certain direction if they have failed their attempts as scaffolding support. RM also has multiple modules and topics of SE to learn from. The last question of each module is a “Challenge Question” and would reward the player with bonus points if they correctly answered the “Challenge Question”. RM does not have a deep narrative, but there is a sense of narrative in rescuing the dying patient. Although aesthetics is a subjective concept, the illustrations on RM were all original. RM also has freedom to fail but different levels of consequence.
	RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.		RM does demonstrate most, if not all, of the elements being proposed by Kapp (2012). But RM have also added two additional elements which further foster the SE learning experience in the context for HK students. The first is anonymity on the leaderboard. The player may enter their alias instead of their actual names may reduce the social stigma from peers for either scoring too high or low. The accessibility of RM is also critical as a design element; making RM a public online domain may let HK students to learn about SE and compete with others as long as they have a device that connects to the internet.